Questions identified as Community Wiki for a clear reason.
My colleagues have made big bets on Scrum, they are super excited about it, however, when scheduling programming day-to-day often "try it right" on "complete it" is. Of course, time-to-market matters, but then an army of technical assistance has to be rented, and even if the old yet serious bugs have a big backlog, it does not seem right.
I'm worried that we will bend with it
So, I wonder - there's a well-liked dull flavor that smells there? Are you using the Saptrishi method and have noticed that they have not created a different kind of problem? I'm sure it will have the courage to accept the failure of something that you did work. Maybe it happened in the past, or a friend's friend once told you a story at a time ...
Tell me if you have questions about the question. Thank you.
I worked in a company that introduced Scrum to a large scale custom software organization Was trying to use the traditional cost estimation of man hours (months) etc. was used. This lesson was clear: Your team's velocity should assess the cost, not the other way. This was especially devastating for some time, because the delivery date was originally scheduled without consulting the development team, and hence the average speed of the team was predetermined. As a result, we had stopped working in overwhelming amount of overtime, leaving only with unnecessary velocity which was used for more planning.
To learn from that lesson, the development team was given the opportunity to participate in the proposal and pricing steps of the projects, it highlighted a new lesson: If you have 20+ hours If you are spending per week (even after reaching a steady process), then you are wrong doing the herd Our issue was that our business models / customer relations still have to break the line items of cost, compulsory By form the requirements were made mandatory. It is impossible to take advantage of one of the interior features of Scrum, as it is possible to estimate the cost of each future Sprint item (through plan poker), when we originally break, plan, and project: whenever possible Can be planning for the moment now).
I have no idea that an identifiable version that works well for the business model, and the fact is that as a development team, you can buy high-level purchases Without luck, it will not be very luck to apply. Still I have noticed that in other places, the scrum is extremely successful. I have done the work. My personal suggestion is to hire a consultant to evaluate whether (and how) something else to offer to your company Is, and how it will look. Remember, playful methods are meant to be malleable, but they bend very far and you are not likely to benefit from them.
Comments
Post a Comment